User talk:SergeantSelfExplanatory
In this article, we will explore User talk:SergeantSelfExplanatory from different perspectives, analyzing its impact on today's society and its relevance in history. With a critical and objective look, we will address the most important aspects related to User talk:SergeantSelfExplanatory, delving into its origins, evolution and development over time. Through a thorough analysis, we will unravel the different concepts and theories that revolve around User talk:SergeantSelfExplanatory, with the purpose of providing a comprehensive understanding of its importance in the contemporary context. In addition, we will examine the implications and effects that User talk:SergeantSelfExplanatory has had in various areas, thus allowing a broad and detailed vision of its significance today.
Welcome!
Hello, SergeantSelfExplanatory, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! jlwoodwa (talk) 20:15, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Combat Capabilities Development Command Soldier Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Cole. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States Army Reserve Command, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Committee on Armed Services.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Battle Dress Uniform article continued
Just stopping by to continue the discussion about the Battle Dress Uniform article. i wanted to ask about the google document you mentioned a few months back and to see if it's ready or not. If it's not, that's okay. also, i've dug for sources on my own, but it seems to run dry fast and there is very little coverage outside of military journals. it makes me think that there simply might not be enough sources to bring this article to adequate quality, as with many other military uniform articles. what do you think? South of the Tongass (talk) 23:18, 9 December 2025 (UTC)