User talk:Twittspiral

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Havergal College has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Havergal College was changed by Twittspiral (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885382 on 2014-05-03T02:21:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:21, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Havergal College. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:19, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi Twittspirale - I've given you valid reasoning for reverting your edits to Havergal College. Problems include:

• Some of the parameters you provided for the infobox aren't actually parameters; others are repeated.
• The principal appears to be Helen-Kay Davy, at least according to the official school website. If Lois Rowe is not the principal, please provide a source.
• Some of your additions include personal input.

Please don't revert the article without fixing these issues. If you need help, let me know. Continuing to revert without explanation is considered edit warring, and reverting an article 3 times within 24 hours is considered a blockable offense (see WP:3RR). Always discuss edits before continuously reverting. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:39, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Twittspiral reported by User:SuperHamster (Result: ). Thank you. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 14:14, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.   the panda ₯’ 00:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)