User talk:Waswit

In today's world, User talk:Waswit has become a topic of great relevance and interest to a large number of people. Whether due to its impact on society, its historical relevance or its influence on various aspects of daily life, User talk:Waswit has captured the attention of a wide audience. From its origins to its current evolution, User talk:Waswit continues to generate debates, reflections and deep analysis. In this article, we will explore different aspects related to User talk:Waswit, with the aim of delving into its importance and better understanding its impact on the modern world.

This is Waswit's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: Av3 (November 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WeirdNAnnoyed was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm not convinced this compound is notable per usual standards because all sources cited (as far as I can tell) are primary. If secondary sources can be found then cite them and we can reconsider. Also, the article needs some cleanup. Please use the Greek characters rather than "a-helix" and "f-sheet" (these can be found under "special characters" in the editing window). The last section (Treatment) is unsourced; either provide a citation or remove this part.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Av3 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 12:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Waswit! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 12:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)