Vishnufelis

Nowadays, Vishnufelis has become a topic of great interest and relevance in today's society. More and more people are looking for information about Vishnufelis and its impact in different areas. From politics to technology, Vishnufelis has proven to be a determining factor that has captured the attention of specialists, experts and the general public. This article seeks to analyze and delve into the meaning and scope of Vishnufelis, as well as its influence on our lives. Along these lines, we will explore the different facets of Vishnufelis and its importance in today's world.

Vishnufelis
Temporal range:
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Carnivora
Suborder: Feliformia
Family: Felidae
Subfamily: Felinae
Genus: Vishnufelis
Pilgrim, 1932
Type species
Vishnufelis laticeps
Pilgrim, 1932

Vishnufelis is a fossil genus of feline (cat) containing only a single species, Vishnufelis laticeps. It was described by Guy Ellcock Pilgrim in 1932, based on the first cranial material of a cat found in Asia: a fragmented skull found in the Chinji Formation, which dates back to the middle Miocene.

History and naming

The holotype and only specimen, a fragmentary skull, was collected by K. Aiyengar from the Chinji Formation, some 2.75 miles (4.43 km) east of Paridarwaza in Jhelum, India. The fossils were placed in the collection in Calcutta of the Geological Survey of India, listed as GSI-D 266. In 1932, paleontologist Guy Ellcock Pilgrim described the fossils as the new genus and species Vishnufelis laticeps.

No etymology for the generic or specific names was given by Pilgrim, but the specific name laticeps, meaning "wide-headed" in Latin, is a common taxonomic epithet.

In 1978, additional fossils of Vishnufelis sp. were reported, though not described, from the upper Lower Siwaliks in the Ramnagar basin.

Description

Pilgrim described it as a primitive feline of medium size with a low, elongated skull. The nasals are short and narrow, while the zygomatic arches are broad. The second premolar was very small and situated halfway between the canine and third premolar. The third premolar was likewise reduced. At least three incisors and the fourth premolar are preserved in the fossil. He considered it most similar to the clouded leopard among extant cats. Colbert, in his 1935 summary of Siwalik fossils, described it as small.

Classification

Pilgrim in his original description considered Vishnufelis laticeps a very primitive member of the subfamily Felinae.

Paleobiology

Vishnufelis had sharp teeth and probably preyed on smaller animals.

Paleoenvironment

The Lower Siwaliks of Ramnagar were likely a half-closed, half-open woodlands ecosystem with grassy areas, riddled with waterways and floodplain channels and ponds.

A 2020 analysis of carnivoran species considered it part of a Middle Miocene paleobiogeographic province in southern Asia.

References

  1. ^ a b c d e Pilgrim, G. (1932). "The fossil Carnivora of India". Palaeontologia Indica, Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India. 18: 206–209.
  2. ^ Rothwell, Tom (2004). "Chapter 12: New Felid Material from the Ulaan Tologoi Locality, Loh Formation (Early Miocene) of Mongolia". Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 285: 157. doi:10.1206/0003-0090(2004)285<0157:C>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0003-0090. S2CID 85951519. Archived from the original on 2023-08-29. Retrieved 2023-09-19.
  3. ^ "Laticeps". 24 December 2022. Archived from the original on 24 December 2020. Retrieved 21 September 2023.
  4. ^ Vasishat, R.N.; Gaur, R.; Chopra, S.R.K. (1978). "Geology, fauna and palaeo-environments of Lower Siwalik deposits around Ramnagar, India". Nature. 275 (5682): 736–737. Bibcode:1978Natur.275..736V. doi:10.1038/275736a0. S2CID 4294129.
  5. ^ Colbert, Edwin H. (1935). "Siwalik Mammals in the American Museum of Natural History". Transactions of the American Philosophical Society. 26: 125. doi:10.2307/1005467. JSTOR 1005467.
  6. ^ Sehgal, Ramesh; Nanda, Avinash (2002). "Palaeoenvironment and palaeoecology of the Lower and Middle Siwalik Subgroups of a part of Northwestern Himalaya". Journal of the Geological Society of India. 59 (6): 517–529.
  7. ^ Basu, Prabir Kumar (2004). "Siwalik mammals of the Jammu Sub-Himalaya, India: An appraisal of their diversity and habitats". Quaternary International. 117 (1): 105–118. Bibcode:2004QuInt.117..105B. doi:10.1016/S1040-6182(03)00120-4.
  8. ^ Grohé, Camille; De Bonis, Louis; Chaimanee, Yaowalak; Chavasseau, Olivier; Rugbumrung, Mana; Yamee, Chotima; Suraprasit, Kantapon; Gibert, Corentin; Surault, Jérôme; Blondel, Cécile; Jaeger, Jean-Jacques (2020). "The Late Middle Miocene Mae Moh Basin of Northern Thailand: The Richest Neogene Assemblage of Carnivora from Southeast Asia and a Paleobiogeographic Analysis of Miocene Asian Carnivorans". American Museum Novitates (2020): 1. doi:10.1206/3952.1. S2CID 219296152.