Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Ban appeals

In today's world, Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Ban appeals is a topic of great relevance and interest to a wide spectrum of people. Both in the professional and personal spheres, Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Ban appeals has generated debates, discussions and deep reflections on its impact on society. As technology and globalization advance, Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Ban appeals has become a central point of discussion in various fields, from economics to politics, culture and psychology. In this article, we will explore the different aspects of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Ban appeals and its influence on our lives, as well as the future implications it could have.

Weighing scales
ArbitrationCommittee

The Arbitration Committee hears block or ban appeals by email in some cases. These situations include users (a) blocked for reasons that are unsuitable for public discussion, or (b) blocked or banned by Arbitration and Arbitration Enforcement decisions. Examples of reasons that are unsuitable for public discussion include blocks (i) marked as an Oversight block, or (ii) based on CheckUser evidence, and where there exists disagreement between checkusers as to the interpretation of the technical evidence. It is expected that blocks marked as a CheckUser block are by default appealed on-wiki; however, the Arbitration Committee may hear appeals of such blocks if there are compelling reasons to hear an appeal in private.

You can email the Arbitration Committee through Wikipedia if you have registered a email address or directly to arbcom-en@wikimedia.org if you have not registered an email address or been blocked from sending emails. Please read Wikipedia:Appealing a block before doing so.

Users who do not fall into these categories should appeal by using an {{unblock}} template on their talk page or via the Unblock Ticket Request System.

See also