Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extreme Secure Layer
In today's world, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extreme Secure Layer has become an increasingly relevant topic. Whether due to its impact on society, its influence on popular culture or its importance in the scientific field, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extreme Secure Layer has generated great interest in various areas. Over the years, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extreme Secure Layer and its implications in different contexts have been widely discussed. In this article, we will cover in detail all the relevant aspects of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extreme Secure Layer, exploring its origins, its evolution over time and its current relevance. Additionally, we will analyze the future prospects of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extreme Secure Layer and its possible impact on the modern world.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:58, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
- Extreme Secure Layer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
overly promotional and no indication this software is remotely notable, sources given do not actually mention the software Jac16888 Talk 15:35, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I could not find any independent sources discussing this topic in particular; the references in the article are mostly about cookies in general. It seems to fail general notability guidelines. The article itself is relentlessly promotional. --Mark viking (talk) 16:01, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - references provided are insufficient to establish notability of this software; created by an SPA as likely promotional. Dialectric (talk) 02:46, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Google searches give a lot primary sources, and not much else. The article itself doesn't make a good case for asserting notability. — daranz 19:43, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Note: A related AFD is going at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suleman Malik - the apparent creator of this technology. Both articles are authored by the same single-purpose account (definitely WP:AUTOBIO). So far the consensus is to salt it, because it's very non-notable and is repeatedly posted to Wikipedia. Alan(E) 05:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC)- Delete - Poor sources. Non-notable. Alan(E) 05:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.