Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Input kludge
In this article, the topic of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Input kludge will be addressed, which has gained relevance in recent years due to its impact in different areas. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Input kludge is a topic that has aroused the interest of experts and scholars, as well as the general public, due to its importance and significance in today's society. Throughout this article, different aspects related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Input kludge will be analyzed, from its origin and history to its influence today. Various points of view and opinions on the matter will be examined, with the aim of providing a comprehensive and complete vision on this topic. In addition, reflections and conclusions will be offered that invite reflection and debate, in order to deepen the understanding of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Input kludge and its impact on the contemporary world.
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Input kludge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced since 2005. May fail WP:DICDEF /WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 15:43, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:21, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to AntiPatterns? It's from that 1998 book, but I don't see any evidence that the term caught on in general use (there are a couple of other patterns books that list it along with other stuff from AntiPatterns). Adam Sampson (talk) 00:28, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:36, 13 December 2025 (UTC)