Tu banner alternativo

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Contemporary Chinese Studies

In this article we are going to talk about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Contemporary Chinese Studies, a topic of great relevance today. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Contemporary Chinese Studies is a complex issue that covers different aspects that affect society as a whole. From its impact on the economy to its influence on personal relationships, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Contemporary Chinese Studies is an issue that leaves no one indifferent. Throughout this article we will explore the different approaches and perspectives that exist around Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Contemporary Chinese Studies, with the aim of offering a more complete and in-depth understanding of this very relevant topic.

Tu banner alternativo
Institute of Contemporary Chinese Studies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

@Aloneinthewild PROD'ed this about a week ago, and I de-PROD'ed it to see if I could find sources. I've done the BEFORE searches and I can't put it over the line so I'm bringing it to AfD.

The article was completely unsourced except for university materials. I have made changes<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Institute_of_Contemporary_Chinese_Studies&diff=1328683935&oldid=1328679893> commenting-out brochure-type language changing tenses, just trying to make sense of it "as if" it is kept. I found one source for notability, and another which is an interview of the school head with BBC - this should help with verifiability but marginal or ineligible for notability.

This article is not an orphan. It could be linked to Steve Tsang who was the last director. There was some press coverage generated by Tsang's comments in 2023 but I couldn't find a substantive history of the centre, and some of it is Telegraph/Times hype about party members.

It could be either under Institute or School of Contemporary Chinese Studies. If kept, I suggest it be renamed to School as this was its identity for the last/longest period of its existence. Oblivy (talk) 07:21, 21 December 2025 (UTC)