Tu banner alternativo

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Garvey (3rd nomination)

This article will address Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Garvey (3rd nomination) from different perspectives, in order to offer readers a comprehensive and detailed view on this topic. Relevant aspects will be analyzed, relevant data will be presented and various opinions from experts in the field will be offered. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Garvey (3rd nomination) is a topic that arouses great interest and curiosity in today's society, so it is essential to delve into its study to understand its importance and impact in different areas. Throughout this article, different facets of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Garvey (3rd nomination) will be explored, with the purpose of providing readers with a complete and enriching overview of this topic.

Tu banner alternativo
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The previous nomination was made recently and closed as speedy keep. It's incredibly unlikely anything different will turn up here. NAC. Beerest355 Talk 16:39, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Kate Garvey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Be Bold. This girl is NN. D. Wiki hero-worship Cruft. Train Derailment2013 (talk) 15:02, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

  • Comment by Nom. I am sincerely sorry you feel this way. I am, however, working with the best interests of the Wikipedia community (Gemeinschaft) in mind. Sometimes drastic measures must be taken in the name of the community's interest. Train Derailment2013 (talk) 15:11, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Indeed they must. I am considering proposing that any further nominations for deletion to this article be estricted to contributors with a good and substantial editing record. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:14, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.