Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumud Das (3rd nomination)
In this article we will exploreWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumud Das (3rd nomination)_, a topic that has captured the attention and intrigue of many people over time. _Var1_ is an issue that has generated debate, controversy and admiration in various areas of interest, from science to art, through politics and history. Through this writing, we will seek to further understand the implications and meaning of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumud Das (3rd nomination)_, as well as its impact on society and the world in general. We will immerse ourselves in its essence, its evolution over the years and the different perspectives that exist around this topic. Get ready to enter a world of discoveries and reflections about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumud Das (3rd nomination)_.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:03, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kumud Das (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable journalist to be in Wikipedia. No such independent and reliable citations. Moreover, the veteran journalist Kumud Das' (This-> https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/toireporter/author-Kumud-Das-479222214.cms) name similarates with this Wiki person - hence, I appeal for a thorough investigation. - NeverTry4Me - TT page 06:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:24, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:24, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:24, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Journalists are hard to evaluate. But like any other one in WP:CREATIVE, their work needs to be discussed. If we can find critical reception of their published work, this can take a 180 degree turn. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:12, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
off-topic / resolved
|
|---|
|
- Weak keep - there is critical attention sourced in the article, e.g. Kumud Das honoured with Sangbad Prahari (Stellar News) that describes his career, including books he has written and a previous award the New Indian Express reports as "best human interest story" in electronic media. I also found the link to the Sentinel article about a third award (the one in the article is incorrect). My !vote is a weak keep because these sources indicate WP:BASIC notability for his career and secondary source recognition, but I have not been able to find additional sources. Beccaynr (talk) 00:11, 29 January 2022 (UTC) (besides this: 20 Journalists Chosen For Assam Pension Scheme (Pratidin Bureau, 2020) "The pension is provided every year as a token of recognition of their contribution to journalism during their service.") Beccaynr (talk) 00:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:06, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:54, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as the article fails to meet the WP:GNG guideline. If the journalist was notable and had a lot of significant coverage, then it would meet the guideline but it does not. Only create articles that are about journalists if they are notable and meet the guideline like I said before. --Vaco98 (talk) 22:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: as per nom. and others. - Hatchens (talk) 04:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.