Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Sargent
Today, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Sargent is a topic that has acquired great relevance in various areas of society. From politics to popular culture, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Sargent has become a constant point of discussion and a source of inspiration for many people. Over time, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Sargent has grown in importance and has had a significant impact on the way people interact with each other. This article aims to explore in detail the impact of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Sargent on today's society and examine how it has evolved over time. Likewise, the different perspectives and opinions that exist around Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Sargent will be analyzed, with the aim of providing a comprehensive vision of this very relevant topic.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was IAR close. Disruptive editor. Any editor in good standing is welcome to open a nomination should they see fit. Star Mississippi 18:05, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Raymond Sargent (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Uses IMDb sources, which is a user-generated website. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. GNG states that a topic is presumed suitable for a stand-alone article if it has received "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." In this case, there isn't enough significant coverage for this actor/musician. I have made an attempt to look for the significance of this person, but have yielded no significant coverage for this person. Per WP:NBIO, which demands significant roles in notable productions or substantial critical attention via independent reviews. Sargent's minor roles and local work don't qualify without such evidence. ExtraTerrestrial120 (talk) 17:22, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.