Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Runit Debbarma
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Runit Debbarma is a topic that has captured the attention of millions of people around the world. Its impact has been felt in different aspects of daily life, from the social to the economic sphere. Over the years, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Runit Debbarma has generated discussions and debates in various sectors, causing significant changes in the way certain problems are addressed. In this article, we will thoroughly explore Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Runit Debbarma and its influence on today's society, analyzing its different dimensions and highlighting its relevance today.
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Runit Debbarma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Except for the third citation from his self-published book and the fourth citation of a blog, none of the other sources offer independent information about the author. Most of the references seem to originate from self-published material or from obscure, little-known publishers. The awards listed in the infobox cannot be verified through any reliable sources, and a general online search turns up no credible or mainstream mentions of the author. This strongly indicates that the subject lacks notability. In other words, the article reads more like self-promotion or paid publicity than a neutral entry. Too much personal information was added, which clearly indicates that the article’s author is closely connected to the subject, and this information is not available in the public domain. Despite deletion warnings and maintenance tags, the author removed the tags without providing any proper explanation. Khorang 17:13, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Khorang 17:13, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:15, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - those citations are not enough for a BLP. Ping me if you find and add three better sources. Bearian (talk) 12:09, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
- Comment The author of this article has been repeatedly deleting/removing the tags without any explanation. And renaming his edit summary as 'references', whereas he is only adding 'categories'. (ambiguous summary). Khorang 07:23, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
Delete - fails WP:GNG at first and then WP:AUTHOR.--SaTnamZIN (talk) 09:08, 14 December 2025 (UTC)- Delete I removed two refs that don’t support the article content. The claim of notability seems to rest exclusively on his winning a prize. I’m doubtful that the prize alone would be enough for that, but in any case the claim is unsourced. Not enough for a BLP. Mccapra (talk) 11:04, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:NAUTHOR. Svartner (talk) 11:42, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: The nominator of this AfD canvassed many users in an attempt to get them to vote here. See their contributions and talk page. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 11:55, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Illusion Flame: I got the same message and took a look at the matter. It seems the bigger concern was that the article creator was disruptively removing deletion templates. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:59, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tripura-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:33, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:33, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- Comment - I have withdrawn my !vote. --SaTnamZIN (talk) 02:16, 15 December 2025 (UTC)