Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soura Nath
This article will address the topic of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soura Nath, which has gained relevance in various areas in recent years. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soura Nath is a topic that has aroused curiosity and interest in society, generating debate and reflection around its implications and repercussions. Through this article, we seek to provide a broad and objective vision of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soura Nath, analyzing its different dimensions and offering a complete overview of its importance and relevance. Likewise, it is intended to deepen the knowledge and understanding of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soura Nath, providing the reader with the necessary tools to understand its nature and scope.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:09, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}. |
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Soura Nath (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
19 year old photographer, does not meet GNG. The blurb "His works got recognized by several national and International organizations", is sourced to 35awards and Viewbug and while perhaps true in the strictly technical sense, said recognition is insignificant. Eostrix (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 09:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Eostrix (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 09:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Eostrix (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 09:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Clearly fails GNG and written for promotional purpose.13:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Did I say it right? I meant what everyone else said. AdoTang (talk) 14:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
| Blocked socks. Mz7 (talk) 21:52, 14 April 2021 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep He looks like a notable photographer. The sources already in the article are sufficient to demonstrate the notability of the subject.Georgeart01 (talk) 00:11, 10 April 2021 (UTC)— Georgeart01 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. --Eostrix (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 19:30, 9 April 2021 (UTC)- To the contrary, there is not a single reliable secondary independent source in the article. Most of the sources are profiles in social media / photography databases that were most probably written by Nath himself. Another source (WePhoto Portrait Ebook vol.8) has Nath as an author. Searching doesn't bring up much more on this young photographer.--Eostrix (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 19:36, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:38, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:38, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, does not meet WP:CREATIVE, wikipedia is not here for the promotion of someones work, may also be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:38, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Bogus sourcing; likely a promotional autobiography. If a checkuser happens to be passing through, the Keep votes are obvious candidates for CU.--- Possibly (talk) 22:51, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - the subject of this article does not meet notability requirements for WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. I agree that there are some fishy-looking !iVote-keeps above. Netherzone (talk) 23:50, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - does not meet GNG or CREATIVE Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:25, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG Devokewater 08:02, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.