Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. R. N. Rao
In this article we are going to address the topic of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. R. N. Rao from different perspectives, with the aim of offering a broad and complete vision of this topic. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. R. N. Rao is a topic of great relevance today, since it impacts different areas of society, culture, economy, politics and daily life. Along these lines, we will explore the different facets of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. R. N. Rao, analyzing its history, its current implications and its possible future developments. In addition, we will focus on specific aspects that raise interest around Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. R. N. Rao, such as its influence on certain population groups, its impact on the environment or its relationship with other relevant phenomena. In short, this article seeks to offer a complete and enriching overview of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. R. N. Rao, providing information, reflections and analysis that may be of interest to all types of readers.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I'm withdrawing the nom, I obviously forgot NPROF. (non-admin closure) monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- T. R. N. Rao (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
All sources are primary or authored by the subject himself. HE is an ACM Fellow and IEEE Fellow - see https://awards.acm.org/award_winners/rao_1788686 and https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=782176
But there are no biographies or articles about him that are independent and/or in-depth. monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 15:50, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Computing, India, and United States of America. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 17:11, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy keep WP:SK3, totally erroneous nomination that clearly states in the nomination statement itself a double pass of notability through WP:PROF#C3. Note that although this criterion still requires its sources to be reliable, they are allowed to be primary and non-independent (statements from the society giving the fellowships as also given in the nomination statement itself) and that PROF in general does not rely on having in-depth independent secondary sources. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:16, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- Incidentally, as distinguished professor and Z.L. Loflin Chair Professor (various author bios on his publications) he also passes #C5, and his citation counts give him a strong case for #C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:11, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:24, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per David Eppstein. Mccapra (talk) 20:04, 2 December 2025 (UTC).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.