Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Test report
Today we are going to explore Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Test report, a topic that has captured the attention of people of all ages and walks of life. Since its emergence, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Test report has generated great interest due to its impact on our society and our daily lives. In this article, we are going to dive into the history of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Test report, explore its implications in today's world, and reflect on its future. Whether you are an expert on the topic or just curious to learn more about it, this article will provide you with a complete and insightful overview of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Test report. Join us on this fascinating journey!
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Test report (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to fail WP:DICT. There's no point listing or giving examples of every test report, a test report is a report of a test, there's nothing more to it. Also probably written by AI. SecretSpectre (talk) 09:51, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:DICTDEF. It's a weird article that manages to say both nothing and everything at once, listing off all types of examples of a self-explanatory concept (but only cites one reference, from the FDA website). I could live with a BLAR to compliance testing as a second option. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 12:17, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Science, Chemistry, and Environment. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:57, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per above, fails WP:DICTDEF. Simple case, I don't think more needs to be said. Ldm1954 (talk) 17:21, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
- Having said "don't think more...", I will point to EU Digital Product Passport and EU responsible person which both look like slightly longer but comparable failures of WP:DICTDEF with strong indications of WP:AI, all produced by the relatively new editor @Chris D. O'Connor. Ldm1954 (talk) 17:33, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
- Delete on Wikipedia-is-not-a-dictionary grounds. Also, let's leave bullet hell to the video games, shall we? Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 17:48, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NOTDICT has been covered plenty already, but the added bit of suspected AI means it's probably best to WP:TNT anyways when it comes to copyright. KoA (talk) 19:27, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Lijil (talk) 22:04, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- Delete all AI slop, and those which fail WP:NOTDICT have even more reason to go. Iljhgtn (talk) 13:16, 18 December 2025 (UTC)