In the contemporary world, Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives has acquired an unusual relevance that has impacted various aspects of society. Since its emergence, Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives has generated debates, controversies and significant changes in different areas, from culture to the economy. Its influence has spread globally, attracting the attention of specialists, researchers and the general public. In this article, we will explore the impact of Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives on today's society, analyzing its implications and reflecting on its role in the modern world.
A change was made outside of the height/weight. The edit looks constructive, but was incorrectly tagged as changing the height or weight. Supposedly there is already a check for a reference that happens to be on the same line, but it doesn't seem to be working in this instance.
Obviously, this is a false positive, but is there actually a way to prevent the filter from triggering when the infobox properties are on the same line? I can't say I know of one, but I am frankly still a little rusty. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆(𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 02:25, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
Not done though a change to the filter may be needed. Your article was also previously deleted in draftspace. That said, draftspace moves shouldn't be blocked by this filter. – HurricaneZetaC14:53, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
@HurricaneZeta: I think this is probably one of those that is a true positive. Moving to Draft:Ajsanzacr83 is certainly disruptive and unnecessary, and the page title would most likely be Draft:(whatever their draft is about), rather than their username. No filter change applied. EggRoll97(talk) 23:21, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
This edit was tagged as "possible vandalism", even though it doesn't look like it is. It just appears to be changing a comma into a <br/> markup. This also happened with the London Spirit and Manchester Originals pages, with the log IDs being 42980949, and 42980952, albiet with the former having more changes. Nonetheless, all of these edits seem constructive.
I was not attempting to make unconstructive edits, I was adding judge votes like I was with every other year and the filter lets me do it for every other year besides 2018 for some reason
Private – One or more of the filters triggered are private, and the request needs to be evaluated by an edit filter helper or manager. – I am not LTA 1307. I was attempting to oppose a DYK nomination for having egregious amounts of WP:UGC and clearly failing a DYK's basic referencing criteria but I'll assume that the only reason for this is that the last two digits of my temporary account are racist. I can't see how else I might have triggered the abuse filter unless there was an LTA that opposed DYK/GA/FA nominations or was of that similar sort of inclination.
Date and time
14:16, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
Comments
Private – One or more of the filters triggered are private, and the request needs to be evaluated by an edit filter helper or manager. Annh07 (talk) 14:31, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
False positive again, this time relating to a userblock direction given being construed as a personal attack on a user talk page (the filter name reveals the trigger word being "Nazi"). Private – One or more of the filters triggered are private, and the request needs to be evaluated by an edit filter helper or manager.
Not done – The filter is working properly. Please submit to WP:AfC, it's likely they will move it to draftspace for you, and only move it to mainspace if it gets accepted. – --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 17:06, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
Was trying to make an edit further elaborating on the definition of shitposting. In the Manifesto subsection of the Preparation section, in the third paragraph, for the first sentence definion, requested to change “trolling designed to engender conflict between certain groups and people” and replace it with “trolling designed to derail conversation in an ironic matter or elicit a response from people not getting the joke”. The previous definition does not clearly define shitposting as it is not always about igniting conflicts.
Done – The edit for this report has been implemented, but no changes to the filter were made. I added your request to the talk page, but I'm not going to implement your request as I don't believe it's an improvement. OhNoitsJamieTalk20:50, 16 December 2025 (UTC)