In this article we will explore the topic of Wikipedia:Featured article criteria from a comprehensive and detailed perspective. We will delve into its origins, evolution, impact and relevance today, with the aim of providing a deep and enriching understanding of Wikipedia:Featured article criteria. Throughout our journey, we will address different aspects and approaches that will allow us to enrich our knowledge and reflect on the importance of Wikipedia:Featured article criteria in various contexts. From its influence on society to its implications in different areas, Wikipedia:Featured article criteria invites us to delve into its meaning and scope, and this article seeks to be a complete guide to delve into its fascinating universe.
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
It is:
well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.