In today's article we want to talk about Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 March 22, a topic that has sparked great interest in society in recent times. Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 March 22 is an issue that has impacted people of all ages, genders and socioeconomic levels, generating different opinions and debates around its importance and repercussions. In this article we will analyze the most relevant aspects of Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 March 22, from its origins to its current situation, with the aim of providing a broad and complete vision of this topic that has captured the attention of so many people around the world.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:19, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned fictional map, no encyclopedic use. ✗plicit 13:19, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:19, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Fails fair-use rational as other images are available - File:Syed Sallauddin Pasha with Ravi Belagere.jpg for example. MB 14:28, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Dubious license due to low resolution, and lack of source and metadata. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Source website does not seem to indicate a free license. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete -FASTILY 00:08, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Non-free images used in a section without any significant sourced commentary about the images. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 17:43, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Source website indicates "All Rights Reserved." Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:51, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Looks way too new to be in public domain due to copyright expiration. According to the source website, Atul Prasad Sen is the name of the former residence owner rather than the photograph's author. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:54, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Novice editor claimed the work was CC-licensed when they uploaded it in 2009, but the archived version of the URL they sourced it from contains no indication of that, instead asserting copyright. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 20:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
"Fan recreation" of a copyrighted logo of Survivor: Africa. Previously tagged for deletion, citing lack of license and source at the time. Then incorrectly tagged with Free Art License. Just now replaced by a DVD cover (see Talk:Survivor (American TV series)#DVD covers). As-is, the image is incorrectly labeled "free" but actually (a derivative of) a non-free logo. If I change the logo's status to non-free right away, and the image is still orphaned, the image would have been deleted as such later then. George Ho (talk) 21:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
A quick reverse image search reveals that this image is just copied and pasted from a Facebook page. Also clearly has the authors name embedded in the image, which means the image is very likely copyrighted. Streetlampguy301 (talk) 22:35, 22 March 2022 (UTC)