Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 December 16

File:9928Olongapo City Barangays Landmarks 01.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by IronGargoyle (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The copyrighted banner extends beyond the c:COM:De minimis: it is large and centered. The banner should be blurred/squared, or the image should be removed completely. — Ирука¹³ 02:37, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

• Keep. per c:COM:De minimis point 2: The "Copyrighted work X is identifiable but is an unwanted intrusion to the subject which unfortunately cannot easily be removed." The example of the painting in this section is a very comparable example in terms of size relative to the entire image frame (this is less than 10%). In the present image, it is very clear that capturing the poster was not the primary intent of the photographer. IronGargoyle (talk) 08:00, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

The second point doesn't apply here. The copyrighted images are much smaller and located in the corners. The only thing that even vaguely resembles this image is the image of the scarlet-yellow painting. However, unlike the image in question, this painting is obscured by people.

Next, "cannot be easily removed." I believe the exact opposite. Even with my rudimentary image editing skills, I was able to easily remove the adv. portion without losing the image's encyclopedic value. And if you say that even a gram of this value was lost, you'll confirm that the inclusion of the advertising image was an intentional act on the part of the photographer.

This image is most similar in size and location to the third image from point 6. Moreover, in the second image, the copyrighted fragment took up even less space, and, nevertheless, was removed.

And I'm more than sure that even if the sixth image had just the smallest (square) fragment of the three, it would have been retouched too. Wdwd, please comment.

P. S. The copyrighted fragment takes up 1/7 of the image in question (15%), I measured it. — Ирука¹³ 09:57, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Need more input on applicability of de minimis
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Whpq (talk) 13:58, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Logo of Bangladesh Press Council.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by রিষাদ (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Looks well above TOO DMacks (talk) 15:21, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Chittaprosad-Hungry-Bengal-sketch1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lingzhi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Should be PD-India due to time period of publication JayCubby 15:07, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Why do you believe this image is in the public domain in the United States? — Ирука¹³ 01:28, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:41, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Edmond de Goeyse.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Isaidnoway (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There is no evidence that the image was officially published (WP:NFCC#4). There is no evidence that it is Edmond de Goeyse in the image (WP:NFCC#5/WP:ORIGINAL) – written from him personally, and not from a description. We can just as easily get a free image by drawing a new portrait and publishing it under a free license (WP:FREER). — Ирука¹³ 03:49, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 November 24#File:Edmond de Goeyse.jpg. Pinging previous participant Isaidnoway.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:56, 16 December 2025 (UTC)