Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Lithium/1
There is growing interest in Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Lithium/1, either because of its impact on society or because of its relevance in the scientific field. For decades, Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Lithium/1 has captured the attention of academics, professionals and the general public due to its importance in various aspects of daily life. In this article we will explore different facets of Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Lithium/1, from its origin and evolution to its influence today. We will analyze how Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Lithium/1 has shaped the world we live in and what perspectives open up around this topic. In addition, we will examine the ethical and moral implications that Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Lithium/1 can raise, without neglecting the advances that have been achieved in this field.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result pending
There are uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. There is an "expand section" orange banner at the top of "pricing": is this still valid? Z1720 (talk) 01:37, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- The article is in a sorry state, looks like the typical case of crust accumulation without any major rewrite or update to keep it as a coherent whole... I also see a lot of MOS violations, some duplicate refs, and other issues that I do not think can be remediated without major effort. Choucas0 🐦⬛⋅📬⋅📜 15:29, 5 December 2025 (UTC)