In this article we are going to explore the fascinating world of Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/HelmandAGoGo and its many facets. Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/HelmandAGoGo is a topic that has captured the attention of people of all ages and backgrounds, as it has a significant impact on our daily lives. Through this article, we are going to delve into the different dimensions of Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/HelmandAGoGo, examining its history, its relevance today and its potential impact in the future. Additionally, we will analyze the various perspectives and opinions on Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/HelmandAGoGo, providing a broad and objective view on this topic. Get ready to embark on a journey of discovery and learning about Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/HelmandAGoGo!
| request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 20:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC) |
I indef blocked User:HelmandAGoGo (block log) on Sept 4 for self-admitted trolling on the Benny Hinn article in previous days. That article, about a somewhat controversial preacher, has been a moderate troll magnet over the last year. It has been semi-protected for some time. After HelmandAGoGo, we saw User:EvangelicalArrow pop up (created on Sept 24), mixed edit and trolling, which ended when Netsnipe blocked them on Oct 7. This pattern repeated with User:JesusLightsMyWay (created Oct 3, blocked by me today as an apparent sock of EvangelicalArrow) and User:WhenJesusreturnsinglory (created Oct 6, blocked by me today for the same reason). I strongly suspect this is a single returning repeat vandal creating new accounts before proceeding too far down the line, so that the new accounts are past the new user wait period for editing semi-protected articles before the old account becomes very active and is likely to be blocked. We can continue to respond on an individual basis as new accounts show up here, but if it is a wider abuse incident with a common troll behind it, I think we should try and ID them. Georgewilliamherbert 20:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Confirmed as same user
There are a lot of other users on this IP with them. Some are harmless, more or less. All seem to have some identity correlation though.
Of these, the
Confirmed sock is
No useful contribs, probably but not necessarily correlated (they were making non helpful edits in other areas) ... I advise blocking after you review contribs, and tag as likely socks, but did not do so myself.
Possible sleeper accounts:
Not necessarily useful not necessarily not, you make the call
name blocked already
This abuse is restricted to 2 IPs. I have blocked both of them for a period of time since almost all contribs are non helpful and they seem to be a source of non helpful new IDs.
++Lar: t/c 00:42, 20 October 2007 (UTC)