Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 February 24

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:01, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

• Template:British life barons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per Wikipedia:Navigation template#Navigation templates provide navigation within Wikipedia: navigation templates should not cram as many links together as possible and should be kept small in size as a large template has limited navigation value. DrKay (talk) 23:04, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

• Split into sections per DrKay, there is no need to have more than a decade per navbox, so split would be into 5 sections I guess. Prince of Thieves (talk) 22:21, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

I dont think DrKay is suggesting this should be split into sections. --woodensuperman 14:20, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Even one template per decade would mean too many entries. HandsomeFella (talk) 19:46, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

• Delete. Simply too large to be useful, and splitting to decade navboxes would be arbitrary and useless. It seems unlikely that anyone would actually want to navigate from peer to peer chronologically, so navigation is best left for categories and lists. --woodensuperman 14:20, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
• delete, too big, better to use the categories and lists. Frietjes (talk) 18:45, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NENAN. Listify and/or categorize. We have this recurring discussion on articles having myriads of incoming links, templates like this one contributes to the problem. In this particular case, I find no obvious reason why readers would want to navigate between articles on people who have only this specific honor in common. I was going to nominate this template myself, hadn't DrKay beat me to it. HandsomeFella (talk) 19:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 March 7. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 08:15, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

• Template:Human_cell_types_derived_primarily_from_endoderm (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Human_cell_types_derived_primarily_from_mesoderm (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Human_cell_types_derived_primarily_from_ectoderm (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:50, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

• Template:This Week (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template follows the same format as the Question Time one, which has already been deleted. No point in keeping it. APM (talk) 19:51, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:PERFNAV. --woodensuperman 14:49, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

• Template:Skills Challenge Winners (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template for this non-defining championship only leads to WP:TCREEP; see the clutter at Jason Kidd#External links. There is not even consensus to list this championship in the champions' biography infobox per WP:NBASTYLE. This is not on par with Slam Dunk Contest or Three-Point Contest champions during NBA All-Star Weekend. —Bagumba (talk) 18:03, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. – Sabbatino (talk) 12:43, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Rikster2 (talk) 15:52, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

• Template:NBA All-Star Weekend Shooting Stars Competition Winners (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template for this non-defining championship only leads to WP:TCREEP; see the clutter at Tim Duncan#External links. There is not even consensus to list this championship in the champions' biography infobox per WP:NBASTYLE. This is not on par with Slam Dunk Contest or Three-Point Contest champions during NBA All-Star Weekend. Incidentally NBA All-Star Weekend Shooting Stars Competition has also been defunct since the 2015 event. —Bagumba (talk) 18:01, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. – Sabbatino (talk) 12:43, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Rikster2 (talk) 15:51, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:05, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

• Template:NYRepresentativesHeader (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused test template Frietjes (talk) 16:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

• Template:SEYCSD (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unneeded template. Small school district index. The district doesn't have an article, the high school does. The middle school is PROD'd and should be either deleted or redirected. No reason to have an index template for any 1 high school district. John from Idegon (talk) 16:20, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Delete per nom. I was already planning on nominating this for deletion, as I was the one who Prodded the middle school. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 04:06, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:05, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

• Template:Name culture/main1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

old and unused with no parent template Frietjes (talk) 16:19, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 March 4. (non-admin closure) ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 03:56, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

• Template:Footer_Olympic_Champions_Men's_mass_start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:51, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

• Template:Tamil folklore (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in a single article, topics are only loosely related. Izno (talk) 02:53, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).