Wikipedia:Vagueness
In today's world, Wikipedia:Vagueness has become a topic of great relevance and interest to a wide variety of people. Whether we are talking about Wikipedia:Vagueness in the historical, social, technological or scientific context, its impact and significance are undeniable. In recent decades, interest in Wikipedia:Vagueness has grown exponentially, leading to greater analysis and discussion of its implications and consequences. From its origins to its future, Wikipedia:Vagueness is a topic that sparks passionate debates and conflicting opinions, which makes its study essential to understanding the world around us. In this article, we will explore different perspectives and approaches on Wikipedia:Vagueness, with the aim of providing a broad and enriching view on this important topic.
 | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
 | This page in a nutshell: Try to use clear and well-defined words in all articles. |
This essay describes ways in which writing is often considered to be vague, and then discusses strategies to avoid such problems and fix affected articles.
However, this can confuse the readers if it is not clear what the pronoun is standing in for.
In John McCain's article:
Wrong: Palin was picked as his running mate. (Whose?)
Better: John McCain picked Sarah Palin as his running mate.