Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-10-31/ArbCom update
In this article we are going to delve into the fascinating world of Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-10-31/ArbCom update. From its origins to its relevance today, this topic has captured the attention of researchers, academics, and enthusiasts alike. Over time, Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-10-31/ArbCom update has played a crucial role in various aspects of society, from culture to economics. Through detailed analysis, we will explore the different facets of Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-10-31/ArbCom update, unraveling its impact and relevance in the contemporary world.
Candidates join, withdraw in face of uncertainty
A chat with the elected Arbitrators
6 February 2006
Jimbo Wales appoints 11 arbitrators, increases committee size
23 January 2006
Arbitration Committee elections continue; ArbCom member resigns
16 January 2006
ArbCom candidates (part two)
9 January 2006
ArbCom candidates
2 January 2006
Straw poll closes
19 December 2005
Jimbo starts new poll regarding election
5 December 2005
Last chance to run for ArbCom
28 November 2005
ArbCom voting process
14 November 2005
ArbCom duties and requirements
7 November 2005
A closer look: the calls for reform of the ArbCom
31 October 2005
A look back: the 2004 ArbCom elections
24 October 2005
Current ArbCom members
17 October 2005
Criticism of the ArbCom
10 October 2005
About the Arbitration process
3 October 2005
The history of the Arbitration Committee
26 September 2005
Introduction to a special series: A look at the upcoming Arbitration Committee elections
19 September 2005
|
|
|
A chat with the elected Arbitrators |
Faced with growing uncertainty about the ArbCom elections process, Wikipedians both added their names into the candidate pool and withdrew their candidacy. This week, PZFUN (statement) and Tony Sidaway (statement) announced their candidacies, while Linuxbeak withdrew his candidacy, citing a lack of time and a desire to focus on article writing and editing.
Jimbo did not give any more details regarding the changes in the election, but limited debate began on both the mailing list and elections talk page regarding the changes, with both positive and negative feedback.
Discuss this story