In this article, the topic Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2023-04-03/Arbitration report will be addressed from a broad and detailed perspective, with the aim of providing readers with a complete and enriching vision of this matter. Through a comprehensive and rigorous analysis, different aspects and approaches related to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2023-04-03/Arbitration report will be explored, in order to provide relevant and up-to-date information. The various implications and consequences that Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2023-04-03/Arbitration report can have in different contexts will also be examined, as well as possible solutions or recommendations to address this issue effectively. With a critical and reflective perspective, this article aims to offer the reader solid and well-founded knowledge about Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2023-04-03/Arbitration report, thus promoting greater understanding and awareness about it.
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland was accepted 13 March. New parties were added to the case as recently as 24 March.
Timeline relevant to the case will be (target dates according to clerks):
Scope: Conduct of named parties in the topic areas of World War II history of Poland and the history of the Jews in Poland, broadly construed
In accepting the case, arbitrator CaptainEek said we've received scholarly rebuke for our actions, and it is apparent that the entire Holocaust in Poland topic area is broken
, referring to an academic paper about the management of English Wikipedia's editing process on the topic (see prior Signpost coverage in In the media, issue 4, and Recent research, issue 6).
An editor has requested that Arbcom de-sysop an admin, Dbachmann, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Dbachmann.
Discuss this story