Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2019-11-29/Recent research
In this article, we will delve into the fascinating world of Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2019-11-29/Recent research, exploring its origins, its impact on today's society and its relevance in various areas. From its beginnings to the present, Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2019-11-29/Recent research has played a fundamental role in the history of humanity, influencing both culturally and technologically. Along these lines, we will analyze in depth its evolution, its implications and how it has shaped our way of understanding the world. In addition, we will delve into its possible future implications, offering a broad and complex vision of this intriguing phenomenon that continues to capture the attention of millions of people around the world.
Discuss this story
@HaeB and Miriam (WMF): your "aggregated clickstream data" link for the Gildersleve and Yasseri "Inspiration..." paper is broken, and does not appear to be in the paper itself. EllenCT (talk) 00:49, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Good catch - it was meant to go to m:Research:Wikipedia clickstream; fixed now. (The paper/preprint linked to https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1305770.v22 instead, as the particular revision of the dataset that was used.) Regards, HaeB (talk) 03:30, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- The bot census paper is interesting! I like this bit "The Wikipedia bots of today are human delegates...we impute roles to the bots; these roles should be understood to be heavily tied to the roles human Wikipedia editors choose to play." As a bot operator, it's interesting to think of WugBot as my "delegate" and the ways its actions reflect me and my personality. though the authors describe it in terms of role theory, it reminds me a bit of the intermediary/mediator division in actor-network theory as well. Wug·a·po·des 01:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
← Back to Recent research