Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2020-06-28/Arbitration report

In today's article we are going to talk about Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2020-06-28/Arbitration report. Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2020-06-28/Arbitration report is a topic that has aroused interest and controversy over the years, and it is important to know all its aspects in order to understand its impact on society. In the following lines, we are going to explore its origin, evolution, and its relevance today. Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2020-06-28/Arbitration report is a topic that has been studied by different disciplines, which will allow us to have a broad and complete vision of it. In addition, we will see how it has influenced various aspects of daily life, and what the future prospects are. Without a doubt, Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2020-06-28/Arbitration report is a fascinating topic worth exploring in depth.

← Back to Arbitration report

Discuss this story

• <sigh> and so Wikipedia loses another prolific and well-respected admin and editor in Bbb23 who, rather predictably, has decided he no longer wants to volunteer large amounts of his time to the project in any capacity. I haven't followed the case so I can't comment on its merits, though I'm sure arbcom have followed their process and policies diligently. However, Bbb23 has long been a stalwart in the battle to protect Wikipedia from sockpuppets, vandals, spammers, LTAs and assorted other undesirables and it's hard to believe that his departure is a net gain to the project, regardless of his transgressions. Wikipedia seems to have a knack of losing the relatively few volunteers who contribute greatly to the encyclopaedia, which is regrettable. I wish there was a better way. Neiltonks (talk) 14:49, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Agree, I've learned about that only today. I remember him for uncovering eleven socks in my report, more than I suspected. Hats off in a belated gesture of appreciation... Brandmeister^talk 17:07, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
• I think Bbb23 is a wonderful person who has done an amazing amount of great work. I support the committee 100% in their decision, however. My work in real life deals with an enormous amount of sensitive information. If I did something similar, I would be fired on the spot and it would quite likely result in a felony conviction. -- Dolotta (talk) 16:43, 5 July 2020 (UTC)