Nowadays, Zlatý kůň woman has become a topic of great relevance in our society. Since its origins, Zlatý kůň woman has generated growing interest among researchers, academics and the general public. Its impact has been reflected in different areas, from culture to the economy, including politics and the environment. In this article, we will explore in depth the importance of Zlatý kůň woman, its evolution over time and its influence on our daily lives. In addition, we will analyze the different perspectives and opinions that exist around Zlatý kůň woman, in order to better understand its scope and consequences.
Common name | Zlatý kůň woman |
---|---|
Species | Human |
Age | 43,000 years |
Place discovered | Koněprusy, Central Bohemian Region, Czechia |
Date discovered | 1950 |
The Zlatý kůň woman is the fossil of an ancient woman, an Early European modern human, dated to circa 43,000 BP. She was discovered in the Koněprusy Caves in the Czech Republic in 1950.
The Zlatý kůň woman is either associated with non-Mousterian and non-Initial Upper Paleolithic cultures or with early IUP-like cultures, one of the earliest cultures of modern humans in Europe, which expanded into Eurasia more than 45,000 years ago, following their dispersal out of Africa. On the basis of genetic dating, the Zlatý kůň individual is believed to be the oldest anatomically modern human ever to be genetically sequenced. Her genome represents a deeply splitting lineage basal to the subsequent split between East Eurasians and West Eurasians.
These early Eurasian populations probably mated with Neanderthals in the period between 50,000 and 60,000 years ago, probably during the initial phase of their expansion in the Middle East, and they carried ~2–9% Neanderthal ancestry in their genomes. It is also considered that the early modern humans coexisted with Neanderthals in Europe for a period of about 3,000–5,000 years. The Zlatý kůň woman had a small amount of Neanderthal admixture, going back 70 or 80 generations.
These people do not appear to have been the ancestors of later Europeans, as the very few ancient DNA samples recovered from this period are not related to later samples. The Zlatý kůň woman also has contributed genetically neither to later Europeans nor to Asians.
Among the earliest modern humans that have been directly dated to this period are:
Zlatý Kůň can be described as a putative early expansion from the population formed after the major expansion OoA and hybridization with Neanderthals, and could be linked with non-Mousterian and non-IUP cultures found in Europe 48–45 ka or with IUP.
A similarly recent hybridization event (six or seven generations earlier) has been inferred from aDNA of early modern humans at Bacho Kiro, Bulgaria, around 45.9–42.6 Ka , while a somewhat more distant event (70–80 generations earlier) has been recognized in the genome of a >45 Ka-old cranium from Zlatý kůň in Czechia
A complete genome has been produced from the ~45,000-year-old remains of Ust'-Ishim, a Siberian individual who showed no genetic continuity to later Eurasians. This contrasts with the ~40,000-year-old East Asian individual from Tianyuan, whose genome is more closely related to many present-day Asians and Native Americans than to Europeans. From Europe, only the partial genome of an individual called Oase 1 and dated to ~40 ka has been recovered, and this showed no evidence of shared ancestry with later Europeans