In today's world, 2014 Wimbledon Championships – Gentlemen's invitation doubles has become a topic of great relevance and interest to a wide spectrum of people. Whether due to its impact on society, the economy, the environment or culture, 2014 Wimbledon Championships – Gentlemen's invitation doubles is a topic that leaves no one indifferent. Over the years, it has been debated, studied and analyzed from different perspectives, which has generated endless opinions, theories and discoveries. In this article, we will delve deeper into 2014 Wimbledon Championships – Gentlemen's invitation doubles and explore its different facets, with the aim of offering a comprehensive and enriching vision of this topic that is so relevant today.
Gentlemen's invitation doubles | |
---|---|
2014 Wimbledon Championships | |
Champions | Thomas Enqvist Mark Philippoussis |
Runners-up | Jacco Eltingh Paul Haarhuis |
Score | 3–6, 6–3, |
Thomas Enqvist and Mark Philippoussis successfully defended their title, defeating Jacco Eltingh and Paul Haarhuis in the final, 3–6, 6–3, to win the gentlemen's invitation doubles tennis title at the 2014 Wimbledon Championships.
Final | ||||||
Thomas Enqvist Mark Philippoussis | 3 | 6 | ||||
Jacco Eltingh Paul Haarhuis | 6 | 3 |
Björkman Woodbridge |
Enqvist Philippoussis |
Gimelstob Wilkinson Knowles |
Ivanišević Ljubičić |
RR W–L |
Set W–L |
Game W–L |
Standings | ||
A1 | Jonas Björkman Todd Woodbridge |
3–6, 6–7(5–7) | 1–1, ret. (w/ Knowles) |
6–4, 7–6(7–4) | 2–1 | 3–2 | 23–24 | 2 | |
A2 | Thomas Enqvist Mark Philippoussis |
6–3, 7–6(7–5) | 6–4, 3–6, (w/ Wilkinson) |
6–4, 6–7(6–8), | 3–0 | 6–2 | 36–30 | 1 | |
A3 | Justin Gimelstob Chris Wilkinson Mark Knowles |
1–1, ret. (w/ Knowles) |
4–6, 6–3, (w/ Wilkinson) |
6–3, 1–6, (w/ Wilkinson) |
0–2 0–1 |
2–4 0–1 |
17–21 1–1 |
4 X | |
A4 | Goran Ivanišević Ivan Ljubičić |
4–6, 6–7(4–7) | 4–6, 7–6(8–6), | 3–6, 6–1, (w/ Wilkinson) |
1–2 | 3–5 | 32–33 | 3 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.
Costa Johansson |
Eltingh Haarhuis |
Ferreira Petchey |
Rusedski Santoro |
RR W–L |
Set W–L |
Game W–L |
Standings | ||
B1 | Albert Costa Thomas Johansson |
3–6, 4–6 | 7–5, 5–7, | 6–4, 6–7(2–7), | 1–2 | 3–5 | 32–36 | 3 | |
B2 | Jacco Eltingh Paul Haarhuis |
6–3, 6–4 | 7–5, 7–5 | 6–3, 6–4 | 3–0 | 6–0 | 38–24 | 1 | |
B3 | Wayne Ferreira Mark Petchey |
5–7, 7–5, | 5–7, 5–7 | 2–6, 5–7 | 0–3 | 1–6 | 29–40 | 4 | |
B4 | Greg Rusedski Fabrice Santoro |
4–6, 7–6(7–2), | 3–6, 4–6 | 6–2, 7–5 | 2–1 | 4–3 | 32–31 | 2 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.