In today's world, 2014 Wimbledon Championships – Ladies' invitation doubles is a topic that continues to capture the attention and interest of many people. Since its discovery or emergence, 2014 Wimbledon Championships – Ladies' invitation doubles has sparked curiosity and debate in different areas, generating conflicting opinions and diverse perspectives. In this article, we will explore the different facets and aspects that make 2014 Wimbledon Championships – Ladies' invitation doubles a relevant topic today. We will analyze its impact on society, its implications in various fields and its evolution over time. Additionally, we will examine the future prospects of 2014 Wimbledon Championships – Ladies' invitation doubles and its possible influence on the world around us.
Ladies' invitation doubles | |
---|---|
2014 Wimbledon Championships | |
Champions | Jana Novotná Barbara Schett |
Runners-up | Martina Navratilova Selima Sfar |
Score | 6–0, 7–6(7–2) |
Lindsay Davenport and Martina Hingis were the defending champions but Hingis chose to compete in the women's doubles main draw this year. Davenport played alongside Mary Joe Fernández but they were eliminated in the round robin.
Jana Novotná and Barbara Schett defeated Martina Navratilova and Selima Sfar in the final, 6–0, 7–6(7–2) to win the ladies' invitation doubles tennis title at the 2014 Wimbledon Championships.
Final | ||||||
Martina Navratilova Selima Sfar | 0 | 62 | ||||
Jana Novotná Barbara Schett | 6 | 77 |
Davenport Fernández |
Keothavong Martínez |
Majoli Maleeva |
Navratilova Sfar |
RR W–L |
Set W–L |
Game W–L |
Standings | ||
A1 | Lindsay Davenport Mary Joe Fernández |
6–3, 6–4 | 4–6, 7–5, | w/o | 1-2 | 3–2 | 23–19 | 3 | |
A2 | Anne Keothavong Conchita Martínez |
3–6, 4–6 | w/o | 0–6, 1–6 | 0–3 | 0–4 | 8–24 | 4 | |
A3 | Iva Majoli Magdalena Maleeva |
7–5, 4–6, | w/o | 3–6, 4–6 | 2–1 | 2–3 | 19–23 | 2 | |
A4 | Martina Navratilova Selima Sfar |
w/o | 6–0, 6–1 | 6–3, 6–4 | 3–0 | 4–0 | 24–8 | 1 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.
Austin Suková |
Jaeger Stubbs |
Novotná Schett |
Tauziat Temesvári |
RR W–L |
Set W–L |
Game W–L |
Standings | ||
B1 | Tracy Austin Helena Suková |
6–4, 6–4 | 7–6(7–5), 2–2, ret. | 7–5, 6–2 | 2–1 | 5–1 | 34–23 | 2 | |
B2 | Andrea Jaeger Rennae Stubbs |
4–6, 4–6 | 2–6, 4–6 | 7–5, 6–2 | 1–2 | 2–4 | 27–31 | 3 | |
B3 | Jana Novotná Barbara Schett |
6–7(5–7), 2–2, ret. | 6–2, 6–4 | 6–4, 6–2 | 3–0 | 5–1 | 32–21 | 1 | |
B4 | Nathalie Tauziat Andrea Temesvári |
5–7, 2–6 | 5–7, 2–6 | 4–6, 2–6 | 0–3 | 0–6 | 20–38 | 4 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.