Argumentum ad crumenam

In today's world, Argumentum ad crumenam is a highly relevant topic that has captured the attention of experts and the general public. With an impact that spans multiple aspects of daily life, Argumentum ad crumenam has become a point of interest for those seeking to better understand the world around them. Through its influence on society, culture, economy and politics, Argumentum ad crumenam has positioned itself as an inevitable topic of discussion in any field. In this article we will explore different aspects related to Argumentum ad crumenam, analyzing its origin, evolution and repercussions in the current world.

Informal fallacy

This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (April 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

An argumentum ad crumenam argument, also known as an argument to the purse, is the informal fallacy of concluding that a statement is correct because the speaker is rich (or that a statement is incorrect because the speaker is poor).

The opposite is the argumentum ad lazarum.

Examples:

• "If you're so smart, why aren't you rich?"
• "This new law is a good idea. Most of the people against it are riff-raff who make less than $20,000 a year."
• "Warren Buffett is hosting a seminar. This seminar is better than others, because Warren Buffett is richer than most people."

References

This logic-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

• v
• t
• e