In this article we want to address the issue of Bazaya, which has gained unprecedented relevance in recent years. Bazaya is a topic that has captured the attention of experts in various fields and has generated an intense debate worldwide. There are many aspects that can be explored in this regard, from its impact on society to its implications in the economic sphere. Along these lines, we intend to delve into the various perspectives that exist on Bazaya, as well as the possible future scenarios that could arise from its evolution. Without a doubt, this is a topic of great complexity and scope, so it is essential to analyze it from multiple angles to fully understand its importance and significance today.
Bazaya | |
---|---|
Issi'ak Assur | |
King of Assur | |
Reign | c. 1649–1622 BC |
Predecessor | Iptar-Sin |
Successor | Lullaya |
Issue | Shu-Ninua |
Father | Iptar-Sin |
Bazaya, Bāzāia or Bāzāiu, inscribed mba-za-a-a and of uncertain meaning, was the ruler of Assyria c. 1649 to 1622 BC, the 52nd listed on the Assyrian King List, succeeding Iptar-Sin, to whom he was supposedly a great-uncle. He reigned for twenty-eight years and has left no known inscriptions.
The Assyrian king lists[i 1][i 2][i 3] give Bazaya’s five predecessors as father-son successors, although all reigned during a fifty-two period, stretching genealogical credibility. All three extant copies give his father as Bel-bani, the second in the sequence, whose reign had ended forty-one years earlier and who had been the great-grandfather of his immediate predecessor. The literal reading of the list was challenged by Landsberger who suggested that the three preceding kings, Libaya, Sharma-Adad I and Iptar-Sin may have been Bel-bani's brothers.
The Synchronistic Kinglist[i 4] gives his Babylonian counterpart as Peshgaldaramesh of the Sealand Dynasty. He was succeeded by Lullaya, a usurper, whose brief reign was followed by that of Bāzāiu’s own son, Shu-Ninua.