In today's world, User:Xymmax has become a topic of great importance and interest to a wide spectrum of society. From its impact on the economy, culture, politics and daily life, to its influence on health and the environment, User:Xymmax has achieved unmatched relevance today. Over the years, the study and analysis of User:Xymmax has evolved, allowing a greater understanding of its implications and consequences. In this article, we will explore in depth the different facets of User:Xymmax, analyzing its effects and challenges in the contemporary world.
An example of one of the fabulous free images available at Wikimedia Commons.
I first registered this account - my first - April 20, 2007. Since then, I've gotten involved pretty deeply in AfD work. I see it as a chance to triage articles that are flawed, but may yet have potential.
If you need access to a Wikipedia article that has been deleted, ask me. If it's not a copyright violation, libel, or personal information, and has not been deleted as a suspected biographies of living persons violation, I will userfy the article for you.
I maintain a sock account AVPW primarily for use on public networks. In the event of a compromised account, I specifically request any administrator to honor a request from AVPW to block this account, and absolve you in advance of any repercussions.
adding unsourced info after many warnings. Indicating they are Wikipedia admin - see HERE-1, HERE-2, and indicating they are the principal of Assumption College, Kilmore - HERE-2 after COI message has been placed on editor page. Suggest to blocked editor to editor the said page. Cassiopeiatalk 00:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC) (Moved by bot)(Moved by bot)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 21:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. As far as I can tell, the username does not match the nam,e of the organization they were spamming. Just Step Sidewaysfrom this world ..... today 18:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. There are other people with the name "Osama" other than that one. Would need to see stronger evidence that's whom they are referencing. 331dot (talk) 11:14, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Comment: I'm not clear on the violation here. They may be editing promotionally, but that is not a username issue. 331dot (talk) 11:11, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Malinaccier (talk) 12:21, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection:BLP policy violations – There were some recent unconstructive edits and this person was recently featured in a MrBeast video, so I believe it is necessary to add page protection to protect against vandalism. ImTheAvidPheasant (talk) 22:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. At least 14 vandalism edits in the last 50 edits. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 23:39, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Creates short, focussed article that are consistently suitable during patrol; an experienced editor most active in areas other than page creation. Klbrain (talk) 14:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
My previous application was rejected as I didn't meet the minimum 25 articles requirement, but now I've surpassed that and continue to create more, mainly focusing on film articles and Indian village and town articles. I believe I have sufficient knowledge about WP:GNG, WP:NFILM, WP:NPOL, and more. Therefore, I think I'm now eligible for this right. Thanks. Grabup (talk) 15:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days (). — MusikBottalk 15:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done – @Grabup:, Numerous articles of yours are missing references (Narayanpur, Dakshin Dinajpur, Dahuakuri, and Chandmukh). If you are given autopatrolled, it is because you are creating quality articles. Based on my review, I do not think you have sufficient knowledge of what Wikipedia considers quality writing and referencing and am not comfortable giving you the tools. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 17:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
@HickoryOughtShirt?4, These articles are about villages, and there aren't any sources available for them. I understand Wikipedia's rules about citing sources well. You can check my film articles; they have good sources. For instance, Fairy Folk, UT69, and Dukaan. Villages don't usually get covered in the news, so it's hard to find citations for them. But I appreciate your opinion. Grabup (talk) 17:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
@Grabup:, if you cannot find sources for something, you cannot put it in. It's as simple as that. I don't want to discourage you but this further reiterates to me that you need to spend more time around article creating. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 17:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
HickoryOughtShirt?4, it's not an "opinion" that sources are required. Wikipedia:Verifiability is policy. Schwede66 20:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Schwede66, I am unsure how what I wrote above came across as if I was saying it's an opinion. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, HickoryOughtShirt?4, I was trying to address the applicant, of course. I grabbed the wrong user name; this was supposed to be for Grabup. My mistake. Schwede66 22:08, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
I am making a request on behalf of myself, as I sometimes create new articles pretty often (mostly New Brunswick-related). As of right now I have 66 live articles, and I have expanded plenty more. I have had a few deletions: two articles when I was brand new to editing & one list I created in mid-2023 (due to not completely understanding WP:BLPCRIME at the time). Otherwise, my articles have been pretty straightforward and vary in quality, with most being Start/C-class by the time I publish them. I had a little bit of a rough start when it came to "notability knowledge", as many do, but overtime I have grown to have an understanding of WP:GNG and WP:MOS when writing articles. Thanks, B3251 (talk) 11:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
I have created at least 25 articles that follow WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG about singers and albums. I am familiar with WP:C, WP:V, and WP:BURDEN in my articles, without copying content without permission, and I make sure my info is sourced in any articles I created. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 12:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
I recently noticed this user, Princess of Ara. An editor who works mainly on Nigerian related articles and others. While trying to appreciate the user's effort, I got in love with the lovely articles, well sources, written from a volunteer in good faith and now, I am requesting that she be granted the auto patrol user right. It'll also help reduce heavy backlog of NPP. Thanks for your consideration! Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 08:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I need to translate a page (Team Zero Percent Page) in french and I want to upload the Team 0 Logo but fot that, I need to be confirmed because it's a non-free file. Thanks for read me and sorry for disturbing. Babagass (talk) 11:38, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done – If the file you want to upload is available under a free license, it should be uploaded to our free media repository, Commons. You do not need any special permissions to upload there, and you can use the same username and password you use here. If it is not available under a free license, it should be requested using the Files for upload process, which does not require any special permissions. Just Step Sidewaysfrom this world ..... today 23:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag.
Page mover
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I'm actively participating in editing and reverting disruptive edits, vandalism by patrolling the RecentChanges. I use Twinkle/RedWarn to revert edits. I'm interested in pending changes reviewer rights so I can patrol any new edits that involves Vandalism, Disruptive Edits, Edit Testings, Trolls and approve constructive edits. Looking forward :) 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 17:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days (). — MusikBottalk 17:20, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done for the same reason I declined their most recent request for rollback -Fastily 06:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
I have experience in patrolling recent changes for vandalism and other forms of nonconstructive editing, and other places for content policies, using various gadgets. It would be nice to have the ability to properly review edits on pages with pending changes protection. Cleo Cooper (talk) 20:47, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
I have experience reverting problematic edits before, and I believe that I can do more with this new role. I have read WP:PCCRITERIA and the related guidelines. Thanks for taking the time of reading this application! Morris80315436 (talk) 07:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'am applying again for Pending Changes Reviewer, as it was felt by a person who reviewed this that my request was "all over the place" and that "I didn't understand that PC rights are". I don't think that's fair.
I was simply just giving my experience and of having done 632 edits on Wiki involving mostly updating critical information, having been an Editor since Feburary 2021, and being familiar with Wiki Guidelines & Copyright and understanding the importance of making sure the info on Wiki is correct, and preventing Vandalism. And other requests saying that exact same stuff were approved, so not sure what to say but, I'am aware of the importance and privliege of this permission, and would like my request to be considered fairly, as it did not feel like that was the case the first time, based on the response that I got. Sunnyboi18 (talk) 14:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days (). — MusikBottalk 14:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Hello, for some time now I have been patrolling Special:RecentChanges occasionally and reverting vandalisms that I identify, using Twinkle. In addition to reverting, of course I also notify the users who commit these acts of vandalism. I also usually make reports to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. I'm adding this request for obtaining the rollback tool here because I would like to have access to semi-automatic tools, namely Huggle, which would greatly facilitate the work currently done with several clicks. I enjoy patrolling recent changes and I'm sure that becoming a rollbacker would make my work easier. I have been a rollbacker on Commons for over a year and understand how the tool works, as well as the risks associated with it, committing myself not to misuse it, under the risk of losing it and possibly being blocked. Thanks, RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC) RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 06:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks, Fastily, I'll follow your advices! How many reverts do you think it's neccessary during this period? Cheers, RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm not looking for a specific number. But I will say that it's not uncommon for experienced vandal fighters to make several dozen reverts a day. -Fastily 09:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Aloha! I've spent a while going through recent changes and I consistently warn editors with RedWarn. My understanding is that the rollbacker permission can help with this by allowing access to special tools like AntiVandal and speed things up, especially when I need to mass-revert all the edits of a user. Coop (talk) 22:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
I monitor Recent Changes, used to do it very frequently and getting back into it recently. Broadwaygenius(talk) 00:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for template editor.
Template editor
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet
It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.
This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.
Committed identity: 5e0a9af339f30221a08fa86264cf1a81e3637ef17bd7ba87260c63b0fea3cdb0b55f545f061dd97184aa4061626c8c41b7237f4b18ccfdd096bff83e92ce9fc5 is a SHA-512commitment to this user's real-life identity.
Wikipedia editor
This is a Wikipediauser page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Xymmax.
I copied this source code from someone's user page I liked. I did not save the name. Thank you, whomever you are.
