In today's article we are going to talk about User talk:Ad Orientem, a topic that you have probably heard about, but that you may not know all the details about. User talk:Ad Orientem is a topic that has aroused great interest in recent times, since its relevance and impact covers different areas. This is a topic that has been present throughout history, but is currently taking on special importance due to various factors. Throughout this article, we are going to delve into User talk:Ad Orientem to better understand its meaning, its impact and its relevance in today's society. Read on to find out everything you need to know about User talk:Ad Orientem!
Welcome! Please read this before posting here.
If you have questions comments or concerns feel free to drop me a line below. Please post new topics at the bottom of this page, and remember to sign your message with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic. |
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 15:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
(This message was sent to User:Ad Orientem and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
Myself and another editor have concerns about inappropriate comments made about a BLP, where an editor has twice implied on the article's talk page that the subject has down syndrome based on their personal observation, here and here, and then doubled down on their claim on their talk page here. An inquiry about Revdel was made on my talk page here, so just asking for an extra set of eyes and your opinion. Thanks.— Isaidnoway (talk) 22:13, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2025).

Hello Ad Orientem! I hope you & yours are well! In my travels fixing script errors I encountered the Runit Debbarma article. It has been nominated for deletion (discussion here) but unfortunately the editor who created the article, Brendonmotom, is resorting to constantly removing the deletion tags despite many warnings on their talk page. I even posted a polite message hoping to talk them round to discussing rather than edit warring but seemingly to no avail. Might need someone with more authority, like yourself, to nip things in the bud before an editor over there goes too far. Thanks if you are able to help! Take care, 14:33, 14 December 2025 (UTC) LooksGreatInATurtleNeck (talk) 14:33, 14 December 2025 (UTC)