User talk:RebeccaGreen
Today we want to address a topic that has gained great relevance in recent years. User talk:RebeccaGreen is a topic that has generated debate and controversy in different areas, from politics to science. In order to fully explore this issue, we will delve into its origins, its impact on today's society and the possible solutions that are being proposed. User talk:RebeccaGreen is a topic that concerns us all, since its influence reaches different aspects of our daily lives. Through this article, we intend to analyze and reflect on User talk:RebeccaGreen to have a clearer and more informed vision of this topic that is so relevant today.
|
Women in Red January 2025
 
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 17:51, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Welcome back!
I really missed you since you had been mostly gone since early (as in pre-COVID) 2020, but while I was looking for an AFD to consider, I just noticed you returned to regular editing last month, so welcome back! NGL I'm also a WIR regular who was gone around the same time (albeit due to a block I recovered from almost two years ago), but I'm back too. It's good to have you back and it's good to be back. ミラP@Miraclepine 03:58, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Miraclepine: Thank you very much! I was studying as well as working in 2020, and then unwell in 2021, and it's taken me a while to get back here. It's great that you're also back! RebeccaGreen (talk) 07:01, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Same here! I don't have a job (let alone a 9 to 5), but I still have a family to hang out with as well as school to deal with, so I won't be as active as I would like to. In fact, I have a Zoom session to go to in about 15 minutes. Hopefully I can be as great a help to WIR as I can. ミラP@Miraclepine 15:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ildiko Kovacs
Hello RebeccaGreen,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ildiko Kovacs for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.
If you don't want Ildiko Kovacs to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| For your awesome work on Betty Henderson and for your continuous work on the biographies of women! gidonb (talk) 14:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much, gidonb! Not exactly continuous, as I've been away from Wikipedia for a few years, but I do enjoy finding sources to build up biographies. RebeccaGreen (talk) 05:38, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Meyer Schleifer
Many thanks for your work on this page.
I was the original author of the page over ten years ago.
There have been ongoing efforts to slowly remove various Bridge biographies. I do not go on Wikipedia much any more because of this type of harassment and have often missed the 7 day window to comment.
- Thank you, Nicolas.hammond. I have not been on Wikipedia much for a few years, for various reasons. As I said in this AfD discussion, I know nothing about bridge, but I don't like seeing biographies deleted for lack of searching digitised newspapers that I have access to. I can understand your wish to avoid deletion campaigns. I see that you have tried to establish subject-specific notability guidelines for bridge, but the only responses required "extensive evidence that SIGCOV can be presumed for >90% of individuals". I wouldn't think that would be that hard to find, but it would be timeconsuming. Best wishes, RebeccaGreen (talk) 05:56, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red February 2025
Announcements from other communities:
Tip of the month:
Suggestion:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:53, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February 2025
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean Kaelin. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 16:22, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- It was a genuine question, which you haven't answered, not an attack. RebeccaGreen (talk) 16:26, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, it was not a "genuine question". Without any real evidence, you accused me and the other editor of being socks. Your only evidence was that I removed unsourced material from an article and the other editor then nominated it for deletion.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:38, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Dean Kaelin
Thank you for taking another look at the page. I looked at other similar pages to make sure content, tone, etc. was the same, but basically all the info I put on there was deleted. It looks like you have extensive background creating pages for similar people, so I would love any feedback you have! Thanks again! Anna.kaelin (talk) 15:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Sign
Hello, RebeccaGreen,
Thank you for work. I think you may have forgotten to sign your !vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Tennet. Best, -Mushy Yank. 10:01, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- Whoops! Thanks for letting me know - done now :-) RebeccaGreen (talk) 10:18, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
A barnstar for you! |
| Thank you, Rebecca, for your contributions to Wikimedia. Baqi:) (talk) 10:29, 9 February 2025 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much, Baqi:), I really appreciate it! RebeccaGreen (talk) 11:29, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2025
Announcements from other communities: Tip of the month:
Moving the needle:
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,669 articles during this period! Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:53, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
References
February music
 | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
spring flowers and a song bird (in places) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:36, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, Gerda! Beautiful spring flowers :-) RebeccaGreen (talk) 05:55, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
March 2025
Please stop. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Brayer, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Your comment about the timing of my AfD nomination was not appropriate. I would encourage you to strike your remark directed at me. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:50, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- It was not directed at you personally - as I said, "I have commented on other AfDs that I don't understand why new articles are nominated for deletion the same day they appear." That is not personally directed at you. WP:ATD is part of Wikipedia:Deletion policy. I have noticed and commented on the speed with which new articles are brought to AfD in several discussions. Where do you suggest I express my concerns about that, if not in the discussions? RebeccaGreen (talk) 15:01, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- Your scolding was not appropriate. I would encourage you to strike your remark directed at me. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:13, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
March music
 | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
Today: Carmen turns 150, as the main page and my story tell you. I chose a 1962 concert of the Habanera, - enjoy! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:02, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
On Ravel's birthday, we also think of a conductor and five more composers ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:54, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Today I could have written five stories off the main page, and chose Sofia Gubaidulina. I find the TFA also interesting, and two DYK, and a birthday OTD. How about you? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:22, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Today: an opera, 100 years old OTD, on Bach's birthday. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:03, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
Today, 300 years of Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern, BWV 1! We sang works for (mostly) double choir by Pachelbel, Johann Christoph Bach, Kuhnau/Bach, Gounod and Rheinberger! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:41, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Thank you
RebeccaGreen - just a thank you for your tireless work on the article about Patrick Brayer. You found materials I wasn't aware of. As I mentioned in one of my comments in the talk on this - most of his work predates real internet activity. I've felt for a long time that his influence on modern bluegrass was underrecognized. I appreciate your efforts. Zutano999 (talk) 13:00, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, @Zutano999. I enjoy digging to find sources, and I'm happy when I can find enough sources and information to support an article, particularly on a pre-internet subject. RebeccaGreen (talk) 11:32, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Steve Millhouse
Hi Rebecca Green. I would like to thank you for your help with the articles on Philippe Baden Powell and Steve Millhouse. I wanted to ask you what else needs to be improved for the Steve Millhouse article to be moved back to the main space?--Марко Станојевић (talk) 22:59, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2025
Announcements (Events facilitated by others):
Tip of the month:
Moving the needle: (statistics available via Humaniki tool)
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 2,657 articles during this period! Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 13:20, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Refbombs and writing backwards
In Kaye_Tuckerman#Career you added 6 refs after the sentence: Tuckerman is best known for her portrayal of Donna Sheridan in a tour of Mamma Mia! across North America from 2010 to 2012.
I was able to check 5 of them and those do not support the claim.
This often happens when people write WP:BACKWARDS; they use a WP:REFBOMB in order to convince you that what they write is true, even though none of the sources actually support the claim. But that is WP:OR/WP:SYNTH.
The only source I was unable to check was this one, please check if it actually supports the claim that that is what she is best known for. Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 05:09, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
I looked at this bit:
She also played significant roles in '']'' (2019),<ref name="Wicked fly in" /> '']''<ref name="Hirschman"/><ref name="Cohen"/> and '']'',<ref name="Kemp"/> and has been a member of the ensemble in '']'' (Broadway, 2018).<ref name="Robinson">{{cite news |last1=Robinson |first1=Mark A. |title=''Summer'' to Sing Across North America |url=https://broadwaydirect.com/summer-to-sing-across-north-america/ |access-date=24 April 2025 |work=BroadwayDirect |date=November 28, 2018}}</ref>
Can you explain why you think that those sources support the claim that Tuckerman played significant roles in those things? Polygnotus (talk) 05:19, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2025
Announcements (events facilitated by others):
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 09:22, 29 April 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| Thank you for your hard work, both in general and on Kaye Tuckerman. Rebecca, please keep that article on your watchlist, as COI editors will likely return and add promotional material. In general, I'd recommend you to not rescue articles once it becomes clear that paid editing is involved. You can always recreate them a few months later and let them be deleted per WP:TNT. Hope that makes sense. Gheus (talk) 19:39, 14 May 2025 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much for the barnstar, @Gheus! I have now added that article to my watchlist. I was not aware that UPE until you mentioned it here. I looked at the content of the article and then searched for sources about the subject, who seemed to me to meet notability criteria. The creator of the article made no further edits to the article after moving it to mainspace, so it was not a case of a creator reinserting promotional wording that other editors removed, and I didn't (and don't) think it was bad enough to need TNT. However, I will try to be more alert to creators' possible motives. RebeccaGreen (talk) 11:52, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
James Nunn
Hello. I just wanted to say thanks so much for your detective work and then input on the James Nunn (artist) AfD, and I'm very pleased that the result was keep. I thought it was a nice little article that it would have been a pity to lose. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 11:54, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Writer's Barnstar |
| For rescuing Cecil Bevan from deletion via a huge expansion, here's a barnstar. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:54, 19 May 2025 (UTC) |
Women in Red June 2025
Announcements:
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:05, 29 May 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help towards making the content produced as diverse and broad as possible!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:09, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red July 2025
Announcements:
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 09:21, 30 June 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Ildiko Kovacs
Hello, RebeccaGreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ildiko Kovacs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2025
Announcements:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:51, 30 July 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red September 2025
 Recognized as the most active, topic-based WikiProject by human changes.
Announcements:
Tip of the Month:
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 23:55, 31 August 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10
 Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.
Announcements:
Tip of the Month:
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever.
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:32, 29 September 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - November 2025
 Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.
Announcements:
Tip of the Month:
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:07, 30 October 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Improving Drafts
Recently, I made an update to the draft article for Mary Healey after you made one six months earlier in order to keep it safe for another six months. I included some detailed references linked to newspaper articles about the actress which could be considered reliable sources.
You're usually good in updating drafts to keep them going (not to mention trying to save pages from danger of being deleted). Is it possible to look at her husband Morgan Deare, also stuck in draft. There's also a few others that if you get time, could you cast your eye over?
Cheers - I like to try and expand pages with resources to ensure they can stay up here and get these people recognised.Silurian25 (talk) 17:29, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red - December 2025
 Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.
Announcements:
Tip of the Month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:19, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging