User talk:Svito3

Hi Svito3! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 04:23, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Svito3,

I have noticed that you have recently edited pages related to the Russo-Ukrainian War. Please note that, due to community consensus documented at WP:GS/RUSUKR, only extended-confirmed editors may make such edits.

When in doubt, please assume that a topic is covered by this restriction. We call this "broadly construed". If this still leaves you unsure about whether a topic is affected by the restriction, feel free to ask on my talk page.

This is not widely announced to newcomers, so I'm not blaming or condemning you for not knowing about this. I'm also not saying that your editing has been problematic in any other way. Your edit may well have been perfectly fine in all other regards, yet may have been removed for this reason.

Additionally, Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee has recognized "Eastern Europe or the Balkans" as a generally contentious topic area. Don't worry: The restriction to extended-confirmed editors is about the Russo-Ukrainian War, not the entirety of Eastern Europe and the Balkans. The box below contains standardized advice for everyone.

You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

This may be confusing, so I'll attempt to summarize it:

• Only extended-confirmed editors may edit pages related to the Russo-Ukrainian War. Details and exceptions can be found at WP:GS/RUSUKR.
• All edits about Eastern Europe and the Balkans, by all users, need to be done with extra care.

I hope this helps. Please let me know if there are any questions.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:54, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Why did you undo my edits? Was it inaccurate or incorrect grammar? 75.113.159.27 (talk) 04:37, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

I have issue with substance, not grammar.

Social democratic parties are typically considered to be on centre-left and not left-wing as they are perceived as more moderate than democratic socialist parties to their left.

Just branding every centre-left and left-wing party centre-left and left-wing simultaneously does nothing to describe their relative position on the spectrum.

You can check other political parties in pan-European social democratic group, Party of European Socialists, and they all are described as centre-left.

Many green parties are considered centre-left to left-wing, and democratic socialist parties to their left as simply left-wing. Svito3 (talk) 14:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Archives908. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Archives908 (talk) 14:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

So me giving you a warning is comical but you doing the same isn't?

This isn't the first time you engage in edit war with me with terrible reasoning. Now you're just trolling. Svito3 (talk) 15:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

You didn't even read what you're copying as it's a WP:Twinkle message, you're not User:Svito3. Svito3 (talk) 15:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 13:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

As you please. -- Svito3 (talk) 13:13, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Why undo the good edit? I am not a sockpuppet & this is my first time on Wikipedia and I've already gone over faulty refs on pages such as Angela Merkel. Refs unsupportive of statements may be removed and I followed through on that. A single supportive source remained after cleaning up, less than the 2 I managed to cough up for Poland being a parliamentary system. Do not engage in edit-warring! Mr. Maralago pawn (talk) 22:58, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

I understand that semi presidentail system don't have a President as head of state and head of government Mr. Svito But I have proof that it is because I did some research on it. I just wanted to known even though I have proof Why did you delete eventhough I have proof Jochongpresidents (talk) 22:48, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

For @Svito3 For 2 of those

Try look on these pdf/websites Jochongpresidents (talk) 22:56, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I saw that you rejected my edit due to Bosnia's presidency being ceremonial. This is understandable, but then why is San Marino identified as a directorial republic? The Captains Regent are also ceremonial. LVDP01 (talk) 10:59, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

San Marino footnote has the clue: Congress of State is a variable-member directory and the government of San Marino.

I considered adding (ceremonial diarchy/triumvirate) to Andorra and Bosnia, but ultimately it's not part of the government, maybe worth adding to footnote as first sentence there "Andorra is ceremonial diarchy, but is not governed by a directorial system." There was similar wording ages ago. And same for Bosnia. Svito3 (talk) 11:21, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:58, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

All of these are unacceptable behavior. Do not repeat this once your block expires. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:02, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Insanityclown1 (talk) 03:43, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Svito3, in the future, if you disagree with labeling Syria as a presidential republic, it is now official since Syria has a new transitional government without a prime minister, so there’s no need to revert it again. HurricaneEdgar 02:33, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you but I no longer participate in editing that page, so you're leaving comment to the wrong person. -- Svito3 (talk) 07:26, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Did you have any personal agenda, when you changed Poland's political system from the established long-standing consensus of it being parliamentary to semi-presidential, pretending like Ukraine is in any way similar to Poland? Ukraine is well-known as a semi-presidential system, whereas in Poland the power of the president is incomparably weaker, and the power of the prime minister incomparably greater. The Prime Minister sets policy, appoints ministers, the president is but a stop-gap and figurehead. A veto power does not a semi-presidential system make, when you look at actual such systems like in France or Ukraine, you'll see that there politics revolves around the President, he sets policy and appoints government ministers and the prime ministers & so on (of course the parliament elected in separate parliamentary elections has to approve the President's propositions in such a system).

I'm totally befuddled why you would liken Poland to Ukraine in this regard. In any regard! Mrgoodboss (talk) 04:53, 22 December 2025 (UTC)