In this article we will address the topic of V-coding, which has been the subject of interest and debate for a long time. V-coding is a topic that has aroused the curiosity and fascination of many people, since its implications are broad and varied. Throughout history, V-coding has played a central role in important events and discoveries, impacting the lives of individuals and societies in different ways. In this article, we will explore the relevant dimensions and aspects of V-coding, as well as its possible implications for the future.
V-coding refers to the common practice of subjecting incarcerated trans women to be used as placation for aggressive male inmates by placing the trans woman in the aggressive inmate's cell.[1][2][3] This practice has been known to have caused the daily rapes of multiple women.[4][5] This is done to reduce violence according to prison authorities and one inmate.[1][2] However, some individuals mistakenly use the term to refer to the broader systemic sexual abuse of trans women in male prisons.
In 2025, more than 2,000 trans women were incarcerated in federal jails in the US.[6] A 2007 study of Californian prisons found that 59% of trans inmates were sexually assaulted while incarcerated compared to 4% of all surveyed inmates; and 41-50% of the trans inmates surveyed reported rape, compared to 2-3% of the all inmates surveyed. Trans inmates described sexual assault as a "fact of life" while incarcerated. Trans inmates also reported more assaults had taken place outside of their cells compared to the cisgender inmates, indicating that trans inmates were more likely to be assaulted in the presence of officers. Furthermore trans inmates were disproportionately denied medical attention following a sexual assault compared to other inmates.[7] A 2022 study in the same state found that 69% of trans women were forced into performing sexual oral practices against their will in all-male prisons—and that 58.5% of trans woman reported being sexually assaulted.[8]
It is common for correctional officers to publicly strip search trans women inmates, putting their bodies on display for staff members and other inmates. Trans women in this situation are sometimes made to dance, present, or masturbate at the correctional officers' discretion.[9] A 2017 study by the Sylvia Rivera Law Project found that 75% of trans women respondents in New York state prisons were subjected to sexual violence by a correctional officer, with 32% being victimized by two or more COs and 27% of respondents being forced to perform oral sex for a CO.[10]
A 2018 report from the Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality—along with a previous 2012 report in the UCLA Journal of Gender and Law, found that, based on accounts of former inmates, it was common for trans women placed in men's prisons to be assigned to cells with aggressive cisgender male cellmates to maintain social control and to, as one inmate described it, "keep the violence rate down".[4][5] A separate article wrote that prison authorities similarly framed this practice as "violence prevention".[1] The two above articles also reported multiple stories that involved v-coding victims being raped daily. And found that v-coding was common enough to be considered, "a central part of a trans woman's sentence".[4][5]
According to the account of Kim Love found in Captive Genders: Trans Embodiment and the Prison Industrial Complex, "if you look like a female, they'll put you in a cell." Love was placed into a "shock holding cell", i.e. a high security cell; with an inmate they were told would be their "husband". This process was said to be essentially "pimping", as the prison staff would do nothing if the "wife" inmate resisted being v-coded. In addition, the prison staff would sometimes coerce the v-coded "wife" into furthering their sexual role with their "husband" by offering toiletries or medical favors—e.g. giving a "wife" gloves to be used as a condom.[2] The second edition of the same work wrote that trans women who physically resist rape are often criminally charged with assault and placed in solitary confinement, the assault charge then being used to extend the woman's prison stay and deny her parole.[11][clarification needed]
Backing up the previous data on the issue, 2021 California study found that 69% of trans women prisoners reported being made to perform sexual acts, 58.5% reported being violently sexually assaulted, and 88% reported having been "coerced into a marriage-like relationship".[8]

Following Donald Trump's signing of Executive Order 14168 on the inauguration day of his second presidency—which ordered federal agencies to house trans woman in men's prisons.[6] And which defined sex and gender as one and the same;[12] many trans woman prisoners and several organizations issued lawsuits against the federal state. Stating that such order violated the Eighth Amendment's "protection from cruel and unusual punishment" partly because of v-coding;[3][13][14] arguing that they "feared for their lives".[15] Several judges blocked Trump's order,[3][16][17] but federal officials relocated trans women into all-male prisons despite the rulings.[17][18]
Some non-incarcerated trans women stated they were scared of becoming imprisoned for being trans and thus being vulnerable v-coding since the beginning of Trump's second presidency.[19][20]
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)