Niabor

In the world of Niabor, there has always been great interest and curiosity to discover more about this topic. Whether due to its impact on society, its historical relevance or its influence on different aspects of life, Niabor continues to be a topic that arouses the interest of people of all ages and backgrounds. Over time, numerous investigations, debates and discussions have emerged around Niabor, which has contributed to its constant relevance in different fields. In this article, we are going to explore the topic of Niabor in depth, analyzing its different aspects and offering a complete and enriching vision of this fascinating topic.

Niabor
A Niabor, pre-1887.
TypeSword, Cutlass
Place of originBorneo:
Indonesia (West Kalimantan and Central Kalimantan)
Malaysia (Sarawak)
Service history
Used byDayak people (Iban / Sea Dayak)
Specifications
Length60–90 cm (24–35 in)

Blade typeSingle edge, convex grind
Hilt typeAntler/deer horn, wood
Scabbard/sheathWood

Niabor (other names also include Beadah, Naibor, Nyabor, Nyabur, Parang Njabur Laki-Laki) is a curved sword from Borneo, a characteristic weapon of the Sea-Dayaks.

Description

It has a convex edge and concave back broadening towards the tip so that the center of gravity lies at the point. The edge curves in a faint curve towards the tip. The blade usually has one or more broken hollow sections and no midrib. They are usually not decorated. In some versions, a nose-shaped projection is forged to the blade, which is seated on the cutting edge. This projection serves as a kind of parry and finger guard is called Kundieng. It is typical of these swords. Below the finger guard of the blade is rectangular. This place is called Sangau. Between the finger guard and the hilt is called Temporian. The hilt is made of antler or deer horn, just like the Mandau. The pommel is carved in the traditional way and never decorated with animal hair.

The Niabor is very identical to another Sea Dayak sword called Langgai Tinggang. The name Niabor itself is also not to be mistaken with Parang Nabur.

See also

References

  1. ^ British Association for the Advancement of Science (1901). Report of the Annual Meeting, Volume 71. J. Murray.
  2. ^ Albert G Van Zonneveld (2002). Traditional Weapons of the Indonesian Archipelago. Koninklyk Instituut Voor Taal Land. ISBN 90-5450-004-2.

Further reading