In this article we are going to explore the fascinating world of Moldavian dialect, a topic that has captured the attention of millions of people around the world. From its impact on society to its possible future implications, Moldavian dialect has generated debates, research and endless conflicting opinions. Throughout these pages, we will delve into its history, explore its different facets, and examine its relevance today. Whether you are familiar with Moldavian dialect or are discovering its importance for the first time, this article invites you to reflect on a topic that undoubtedly continues to leave its mark on our society.
Dialect of Romanian
Not to be confused with Moldovan language, one of the two names of the Romanian language in the Republic of Moldova.
The delimitation of the Moldavian dialect, as with all other Romanian dialects, is made primarily by analyzing its phonetic features and only marginally by morphological, syntactical, and lexical characteristics.
The Moldavian dialect is the representative of the northern grouping of Romanian dialects and has influenced the Romanian spoken over large areas of Transylvania.
The Moldavian dialect is not synonymous with Moldovan language. The latter is another term for the Romanian language as used in the Republic of Moldova. The border between Romania and the Republic of Moldova does not correspond to any significant isoglosses to justify a dialectal division; phonetics and morphology (which normally define dialectal classifications) are nearly identical across the border, whereas lexical differences are minimal.
Geographic distribution
The Moldavian dialect is spoken in the northeastern part of Romania, the Republic of Moldova, and small areas of Ukraine. It is the only Romance variety spoken east of the Eastern Carpathians. In detail, its distribution area covers the following administrative or historical regions:
Transitional varieties of the Moldavian dialect are found in areas of contact with the other dialects. As such, Moldavian features often occur outside the historical Moldavia: in northern Dobruja, in northeastern Muntenia, and in north-east Transylvania.
The Moldavian dialect has the following phonetic particularities that contrast it with the other Romanian dialects:
Consonants
The postalveolar affricates become the fricatives : for standard şépă, şínî, ĝèni (they are not also palatalized like in the Banat dialect). As a consequence, the affricate and the fricative merge into the latter: for joc, sânĝe. However, the Atlasul lingvistic român (1938–1942) and other field works record examples of pronunciations showing that, while the merger covers most of the dialect area, it is not systematic and sometimes found in free variation. In parts of the south-western and north-eastern Moldavia the distinction is preserved.
After the fricatives and the affricate (sometimes also after ), a vowel shift occurs that changes into , into , and into : for sĕmn, sîngur, séră, ḑer, ḑid, ḑámă, șàle, rĕșină, jále, țĕs, țápĕn, reşĭ. In the same phonetic contexts, the phoneme /ʲ/, which is generally responsible for indicating the plural in nouns and adjectives or the second person in verbs, is no longer realized: (for standard părìnți, vèḑi). As a consequence, the number distinction is completely lost in some nouns and adjectives, such as moș, leneș, colț, ursuz.
The labials receive a palatalized pronunciation when followed by front vowels and become , respectively: for coçil, ģine, ñel.
Similarly, the palatalization of the labio-dentals occurs, but in two different ways. In the southern half of the dialect area they become , respectively, whereas in the northern half they become : for fierbe, vițel.
The dentals are left unchanged before : .
The affricate occurs, as in , as in the Banat dialect, the Maramureș dialect and the Aromanian language, whereas it evolved to in the Wallachian dialect, the Criș dialect, and standard Romanian: for ḑic (Latin dico).
In the northern part, followed by changes into : holbură, hulpe, hultan (compare with standard volbură, vulpe, vultan).
Vowels
After the labial , changes into and into : for lovesc, să lovească.
Word-final becomes : for mamâ, casâ.
Unstressed closes to : for acuperìt (rare).
The diphthong is preserved: for sóre, bólă.
Unstressed in middle and final positions closes to : for lápti, disfác.
In the northern areas, the vowel immediately before the stress opens to : for măgar, bătrân, tăcut, pădure.
The diphthong becomes : for băiat, încuiat.
Etymologic is preserved in the words for câine, mâine, mâini, pâine.
The diphthong in final positions becomes the monophthong : for avea, spunea.
Asyllabic versions of and occur in word-final positions: for pădurar, cojocar.
Morphological features
Feminine nouns ending in -că have genitive and dative forms ending in -căi: maicăi, puicăi (compare with standard maicii, puicii).
The noun tată "father" with the definite article has the form tatul (standard tatăl).
The possessive article is invariable: a meu, a mea, a mei, a mele ("mine", standard al meu, a mea, ai mei, ale mele).
The number distinction is made in verbs in the imperfect at the 3rd person: era / erau, făcea / făceau (like in the standard language).
The simple perfect is not used, except rarely, only in the 3rd person, with the simple value of a past tense.
The auxiliary for the compound perfect has the same form for both the singular and the plural of the 3rd person: el o fost / ei o fost ("he was / they were", standard el a fost, ei au fost).
In northern Moldavia, the pluperfect is also made analytically: m-am fost dus, am fost venit ("I had gone, I had come", standard mă dusesem, venisem).
The future tense in verbs uses the infinitive and is sometimes identical to it: va veni, a veni ("he will come", standard only va veni).
The following subjunctive forms occur: să deie, să steie, să beie, să ieie, să vreie (standard să dea, să stea, să bea, să ia, să vrea).
The following imperatives occur: ádă, vină (standard adú, vino).
When the object of a verb is another verb, the latter is in its infinitive form, including the isolated morpheme a: prinde a fierbe ("starts to boil", the standard uses the subjunctive: prinde să fiarbă or începe să fiarbă).
Genitives and datives of nouns tend to be formed analytically: dă mâncare la pisică ("give food to the cat", standard dă mâncare pisicii).
Lexical particularities
Some words have preserved archaic forms: îmblu, împlu, întru, înflu, nour, dirept (compare with standard umblu, umplu, intru, umflu, nor, drept).
A particular variant for the personal pronoun for the 3rd person occurs frequently and is used for animates and inanimates alike: dânsul, dânsa, dânșii, dânsele ("he, she, they" as well as "it, they", compare with el, ea, ei, ele). In the standard language, these forms have started being used as 3rd person polite pronouns.
The demonstrative pronouns have particular forms: ("this" masculine and feminine, "that" masculine and feminine; compare with standard acesta, aceasta, acela, aceea).
Other specific words: omăt ("snow", zăpadă), agudă ("mulberry", dudă), poame ("grapes", struguri), perje ("plums", prune), ciubotă ("high boot", cizmă), cori ("measles", pojar), etc.
Sample
Moldavian dialect:
Standard Romanian: Ea avea două vaci și se mirau oamenii de vacile ei că dădeau un ciubăraș de lapte. Și așa de la o vreme stârpiseră vacile, nu mai dădeau lapte.
English translation: "She had two cows and people were amazed at her cows for giving a bucketful of milk. And so from a while the cows became dry, they stopped giving milk."
The Romanian vocabulary in parts of Moldavia, Bessarabia and Transnistria. Researches made by Gustav Weigand:
The Romanian linguistic areal (1908)
The extension of the Moldovan characteristic isoglosses (1908)
Spînu, Stela, "Graiurile româneşti din nord-estul Republicii Moldova", Chişinău, 2011
Ilona Bădescu, "Dialectologie", teaching material for the University of Craiova.
Elena Buja, Liliana Coposescu, Gabriela Cusen, Luiza Meseșan Schmitz, Dan Chiribucă, Adriana Neagu, Iulian Pah, Raport de țară: România, country report for the Lifelong Learning Programme MERIDIUM (in Romanian)